Leave a comment

Comments 4

d2leddy February 3 2008, 17:07:46 UTC
The other image is of a woman who is topless and whose "breast is displayed with her hand covering just the nipple portion," Bernstein said. "You could still pretty much see the rest of the breast."

**Remembers Janet Jackson's Breast of Mass Destruction

**SCREAMS

**cowers in corner

What fucking losers.

Reply

dippydawg1932 February 3 2008, 17:11:05 UTC
But that was a breast that WASN'T covered (and even that was a total over-reaction by our entire fucked up country).

What about every magazine cover where a pregnant actress poses naked and covers her tits with her hand and crosses her legs or stands sideways so we don't have to see her twat? Did they raid every Walgreens and CVS is Hampton Roads when those were out?

UGH, this annoys me so much. I feel like taking a stand for Abercrombie - not necessarily cuz I love them (just ambivalent to Abercrombie themselves) - but more to make a statement that our country is headed in the wrong direction.

Reply

d2leddy February 3 2008, 17:13:29 UTC
I don't know if it is so much that we are heading in the wrong direction as it reveals an arrested psychological development.

Reply


hockeyfag February 3 2008, 17:44:44 UTC
I miss the A&F quarterlies.. I still have all the issues here..

Reply


Leave a comment

Up