I read the whole thing, but basic spelling and grammer errors, or in this case getting the proper name of a mythological species wrong, drive me nuts. I was stood at a craft fair earlier frothing at the brain because someone had a sign on their stall saying 'for when your juggling your shopping' as an advertisement for their stuff. It's the same reason why I once went through a copy of New Scientist with a red pen- mistakes like this from people who are intelligent and informed enough to get it right give me reading rage.
LOL. Arthur and his taste in women... XD I DO think his initial interest in her was genuine, but it was more of a "physical attraction" interest while with Gwen it's so much more. That or the writers just fail at continuity again. =P
I DO think his initial interest in her was genuine, but it was more of a "physical attraction" interest while with Gwen it's so much more
I think you're right- he was very Arthur-like at the beginning, it was probably just when she tried to get him to do unArthur-like things (blowing off important ceremonies for his knights) that she started to weave her spell.
Comments 12
Reply
Well, I'm calling them SHES. That's how its pronounced, that's how I'm spelling it.
Reply
It's the same reason why I once went through a copy of New Scientist with a red pen- mistakes like this from people who are intelligent and informed enough to get it right give me reading rage.
Reply
Your welcome.
(heeheehee)
Reply
Pshhh. EVERYONE caries magical sticks around ... right? *holds hers tightly*
Reply
I think you're right- he was very Arthur-like at the beginning, it was probably just when she tried to get him to do unArthur-like things (blowing off important ceremonies for his knights) that she started to weave her spell.
Pshhh. EVERYONE caries magical sticks around ... right? *holds hers tightly*
Yes, but does your magical stick blast blue light and shatter magical people into itty bitty pieces?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment