No, not much in my life has changed (although I have got into 'Second Life'), aside from my featuring in a main part of the recent ''Allo 'Allo' stage production. Voluntary, of course
( Read more... )
(1) You have no right to lecture me about what I post. While I consider you a friend, you've just stepped over the line and made a personal attack on me.
(2) What was stopping you from simply shrugging shoulders and agreeing to disagree?
(3) For you to have a physically violent reaction, jsut because someone's politics disagrees with yours, with all due respect, I find to be a tad over-reactionary. Again, what's wrong with agreeing to disagree?
(4) What I linked to, in regards to the Obama 'civilian miltiary force', which he aims to fund to the same sum of millions and milliosn, as the regular armed forces, is in a public announcement which his campaign put out there. If you consider Obama's own campaign to be a "biased source" against him, I can't help but be confused by the allegation you make. :/
Or are you referring to the Palin thing, which is not making accusations, but is, in fact, a link for disproving false things said about her? Because, if so, then you merely need to click on it and you'll see that it's a palce for
( ... )
though I can't see the deleted post, I am sure I would have agreed. Palin is a detriment to women and our country. I am saddened and disappointed that someone I was friends with can support palin and McCain. I also do think it makes a big difference that you are not in the us and living with our governent. You are entitled to an opinion but I feel it is uninformed and your post was very inflammatory and defensive.
I have rectified, in an edit to the post, that it now turns out not to be linked to the official campaign, but was done with tax money and on school time, which is still as hellishly scary as the one with little kids singing, if not more so, for being a part of official school teaching. Thankfully, the teacher was fired
( ... )
the problem is that your beliefs are erroneous. you think you have investigated and found truths when all you have done is read other media reports and political reports that are skewed and biased. I could find a number of similar items negating your "truths". A responsible voter in the USA, of which you are not, knows to disregard those reports and look into official records, government reports and other unbiased sources. If you did that, you would find that palin did have rape victims charged for rape kits, but the victims insurance was generally paying. But they were still charged and screwed if you didn't have insurance. She also does not believe women should have abortions in cases of rape or incest. She only "tolerates" homosexuals and she is not one who wants to leave the gay marriage issue to the states. She wants to limit marriage to a man and a woman. Obama wants to let the states decide. It just really infuriates me to have you spewing misinformation when it does not even involve you. You have no idea what has really been
( ... )
(1) With respect, you have yet to show that I exclusively look at reports which are "skewed and biased". :) I do my best to look for the whole picture of something, which is something you should know about me. If I happen to post from a certain blog or whatever, then it's merely because that source has the best links and such on it. I have posted links from neutral, Left-wing and Right-wing things, in the past and, needless to say, because of my status, it's pretty much impossible fo rme to be partisan, even if I wanted to.
In the above, for instance, I've posted a video of a real event, a couple of links which merely report Obama's own media releases and another, which is probably the most objective, of all, as it's specifically for anyone to contribute to, in teh comments section, with links to either prove or disprove the various rumours about her, one way or the other. If you wanted to correct something on there, you, yourself, are as welcome to, as anyone else would be
( ... )
Comments 8
(The comment has been removed)
(2) What was stopping you from simply shrugging shoulders and agreeing to disagree?
(3) For you to have a physically violent reaction, jsut because someone's politics disagrees with yours, with all due respect, I find to be a tad over-reactionary. Again, what's wrong with agreeing to disagree?
(4) What I linked to, in regards to the Obama 'civilian miltiary force', which he aims to fund to the same sum of millions and milliosn, as the regular armed forces, is in a public announcement which his campaign put out there. If you consider Obama's own campaign to be a "biased source" against him, I can't help but be confused by the allegation you make. :/
Or are you referring to the Palin thing, which is not making accusations, but is, in fact, a link for disproving false things said about her? Because, if so, then you merely need to click on it and you'll see that it's a palce for ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I have rectified, in an edit to the post, that it now turns out not to be linked to the official campaign, but was done with tax money and on school time, which is still as hellishly scary as the one with little kids singing, if not more so, for being a part of official school teaching. Thankfully, the teacher was fired ( ... )
Reply
Reply
In the above, for instance, I've posted a video of a real event, a couple of links which merely report Obama's own media releases and another, which is probably the most objective, of all, as it's specifically for anyone to contribute to, in teh comments section, with links to either prove or disprove the various rumours about her, one way or the other. If you wanted to correct something on there, you, yourself, are as welcome to, as anyone else would be ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment