My list of Facebook friends and people I follow on Twitter leans heavily toward the portion of the political spectrum ranging from "just to the left of Barack Obama" to "somewhere to the left of Leon Trotsky". (I would define myself to be
trying to be as radical as reality itself.) I also get some less direct exposure, via those media, to people
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
Reply
In any case, thanks for the round up. Going into tomorrow's link salad.
Reply
It wasn't meant to be a comprehensive overview--my sample is limited (200+ social media accounts) and unscientific, though it includes influential outlets like The Atlantic (which was one of the places where I noticed a fascination with the physical dimensions of the "Bushmaster"--a name about which much can be said, semiotically). More a subjective summary of that limited sample.
Reply
And an awful lot of the people I see discontent with the US's crazy gun obsession also seem distrustful of the US government, including when Democrats are in power.
But that second observation is certainly dependent on the observer; I know there are also plenty of gun control supporters who seem quite happy to trust e.g. the government's newly asserted right to assassinate US citizens without a trial, confident that this power will only be used against Terrorists and other Bad Guys. I just personally tend to talk to and follow people who are also skeptical of the government's good will.
Reply
Reply
"Security guard in every school" seems to be where those who start with #4 as an assumption, but recognize the absurdity of having weaponry stationed in the classroom, are trending. And yes, it's an idea that I find sinister, for reasons much like yours. (Hoping to avoid that is part of why I moved out of NYC.) ( ... )
Reply
Which, in itself, is fascinating. I would imagine that most people believe in something between #4 and #1. And yet the advocates of #4 have managed to hijack the political agenda to such a degree that any talk of restrictions becomes a sinister conspiracy by the Islamofascistcommie Obama to take everyone's guns away.
It's weird and scary.
Reply
I think what the unfortunately existing sample of past mass shootings shows us is that physical courage is the most important factor in preventing or mitigating them. And I fear that since most people are basically cowards--but that many cowards misperceive themselves as potential heroes--the temptation is either to outsource courage to people whose "job" it is to exhibit it, or imagine that a tool, transformed into a fetish object (i.e. the gun, wielded in self-defense), will confer its magical powers upon us. Which is why #4 is so tempting, even for people who also, on some level, believe in #1. Hence the contradictions.
Reply
Reply
http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Conn-gunman-broke-in-shot-some-victims-twice-4120488.php
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment