No, we are no more enemies than we were before. Like i say: he's like this ALL THE TIME. I think the rest of the conversation went pretty much like this.... Jacob-Well, i'm off to watch charmed, bye.... George:Yeh Peach Out i'll call you about our jam tomorry. I might add at this point that he never answered his phone about the jam! The reason i posted this is because i know that i am right because everybody know what you mean when you say "everything you say is unoriginal". To get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to mainstream society.
Thankyou for your comments Karl, i'm sorry that you do not like any of my entries but i appreciate that you took the time to read them. In case it was not clear, i in no way meant to suggest that i engaged in any sort of sexual act with the mysterious lady on new year's eve, just that it was an unusual situation. Furthermore, i must agree with you that some pieces could be more logically set out and would be if i had the time. Karl, if you have a livejournal yourself i would love for you to direct me to it. If not, thankyou anyway for your criticisms and i'm sorry if i have offended you in any way.
He means normally internet arguements go something like
person 1: YOU SUX!$!$! I READ YOUR JOUNAL AND I HATE IT, THEREFORE I HATE YOUR JOURNAL - AND YOU ALSO. person 2: THAS CAUSE YUR A BITCH AND YOUR GONNA STAY THAT WAY CAUSE BITCHES AINT SHIT
and so forth x20.
But he was commenting how unusual it was that it was like a dignified and thought out arguement. Still, arguing on the internet is like insult tennis in 99% of most cases. Nobody will ever give in and agree with the other person. So, "It's still an internet argument though".
Comments 11
for significance to people outside of this conversation i think there is a bit of a backstory that needs to be included, unless im missing something.
Reply
The reason i posted this is because i know that i am right because everybody know what you mean when you say "everything you say is unoriginal". To get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to mainstream society.
Reply
Reply
Karl, if you have a livejournal yourself i would love for you to direct me to it. If not, thankyou anyway for your criticisms and i'm sorry if i have offended you in any way.
Peach Out.
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's still an internet argument though :)
Reply
Reply
person 1: YOU SUX!$!$! I READ YOUR JOUNAL AND I HATE IT, THEREFORE I HATE YOUR JOURNAL - AND YOU ALSO.
person 2: THAS CAUSE YUR A BITCH AND YOUR GONNA STAY THAT WAY CAUSE BITCHES AINT SHIT
and so forth x20.
But he was commenting how unusual it was that it was like a dignified and thought out arguement. Still, arguing on the internet is like insult tennis in 99% of most cases. Nobody will ever give in and agree with the other person. So, "It's still an internet argument though".
Livejournal comment = demystified!
Reply
Leave a comment