I hate politics. But I can't help but show intrest in the possibility; nay possiblilty, the sheer fact that our government constantly feeds us prefabricated, falsified information, and the truth is the last thing we finally get. But by the time the truth is released, it's not nearly as pertanent as it was when it first happened. For example, it will be 2017 when the documents related to JFK's assaination are fully released to the public, and 2039 when the Warren Commission's files that investigate the assasination are finally opened. It's the fact that information is withheld for years before the nation can finally hear the truth about anything. Who knows when 9/11's true story will finally be revealed.
I may be a lil different and love politics and love to learn things about it.
But, I definitely see your guys point on not liking it.
And I must say... Tyler, you're awesome. How you put this together is very amazing. Knowing the facts only to the generation prior, so the liability is lifted from the administration at the time. So, with that allabi, what stops them???
Melting isn't the only way a building can fall. Simply weakening the structure, as is proposed by this quote from wikipedia, could easily be enough: "The strength of steel drops markedly with heat, losing half its strength at a temperature of 1,202°F (650°C). The heat from the fires quickly began to weaken the central steel columns, the longspan floor trusses, and cross trusses."
Also: "On the day of the attack, an explosives expert in New Mexico told the Albuquerque Journal that the collapses of the towers looked "too methodical" to be triggered by the aircraft impacts and fires, suggesting the possibility that there were "explosive devices inside the buildings".[22] Though he quickly retracted his remarks[23], the idea has remained in circulation and the rapid collapse of the World Trade Center has been described as the "grassy knoll" of 9/11 conspiracy theories.[24] Prompted by public inquiries, NIST stated in its final report that it "found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were
( ... )
The fact that several other "steel" bulidings have caught fire, justify that and managed to burn much longer that WTC 1 & 2 (The south tower burned for one hour, the north for two)
A satellite image 5 days later showed signs of temperatures on Ground Zero to be around 1300°F. Jet fuel burns between 800° and 1500°F. The temperature would have drasitcally decreased by then. C4 burns at roughly 3000°F, which would have cooled to the 1300°F mark. They also found melted steel in the basement. Regardless of how much jet fuel there might have been, it still wouldn't have melted any steel, even combined with the other things ablaze in the towers
( ... )
1. Fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three buildings on 9/11, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9/11
( ... )
heheh, this may take me a little while to respond to, since it's so long. As in, multiple comments probably over a couple of days when I get the time
( ... )
Comments 9
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
But, I definitely see your guys point on not liking it.
And I must say... Tyler, you're awesome. How you put this together is very amazing. Knowing the facts only to the generation prior, so the liability is lifted from the administration at the time. So, with that allabi, what stops them???
Reply
"The strength of steel drops markedly with heat, losing half its strength at a temperature of 1,202°F (650°C). The heat from the fires quickly began to weaken the central steel columns, the longspan floor trusses, and cross trusses."
Also: "On the day of the attack, an explosives expert in New Mexico told the Albuquerque Journal that the collapses of the towers looked "too methodical" to be triggered by the aircraft impacts and fires, suggesting the possibility that there were "explosive devices inside the buildings".[22] Though he quickly retracted his remarks[23], the idea has remained in circulation and the rapid collapse of the World Trade Center has been described as the "grassy knoll" of 9/11 conspiracy theories.[24] Prompted by public inquiries, NIST stated in its final report that it "found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were ( ... )
Reply
A satellite image 5 days later showed signs of temperatures on Ground Zero to be around 1300°F. Jet fuel burns between 800° and 1500°F. The temperature would have drasitcally decreased by then. C4 burns at roughly 3000°F, which would have cooled to the 1300°F mark. They also found melted steel in the basement. Regardless of how much jet fuel there might have been, it still wouldn't have melted any steel, even combined with the other things ablaze in the towers ( ... )
Reply
1. Fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three buildings on 9/11, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9/11 ( ... )
Reply
Reply
AWESOME.
I love it all. I love the mystery and theories.
Reply
Leave a comment