okay, so i decided to try to "debug" my macro technique to see if i could get results more like the other ppl on the macro forum. i set up an easy, controllable studio session, followed all of the tips and suggestions from this forum....and ended up with something pretty cool! this is the underside of a little bit of fern from outside my apt... mmm
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
To be honest you might get better results with a better quality lens. From my experience with the 100D, better images are produced when you used Sigma lenses.
But I don't know *that* much about Canon, I'm a Nikon person. Because Nikon's are better. :P
*waits for the Nikon D70 to fall on her doorstep*
Reply
what parts of these images do you think would see improvement with different lenses? i'm always open to critique :D
Reply
Reply
I'll get back to you on the critique, mr. Walla. I've fried my brain for today. You can always catch me on AIM, yanno - I miss talking to you! :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
BUT, you can pick up it's little sister the Canon 300D for about $900 (for example, here). It comes WITH a pretty decent zoom lens (certainly FAR better than any point-n-shoot's lens), and is essentially the same as my camera, with the exception that the body is aluminum & it's missing a couple of high-end features. It's a "real" camera, though: interchangeable lenses, tons of accessories, etc. -- You can attach any Canon lens you want later if you decide to experiment.
The only negative is that it's a bit bigger than the point-n-shoots that most people are used to... if you want to be able to stick it in a pocket & forget about it, this isn't your guy. Check out http://www.dpreview.com ... they've got info on everything.
Reply
Leave a comment