I like how when I post about having seen a film of Hamlet, I have to use at least five tags to cover all the categories that falls into. Ah, me. Anyway...
So those who have read my earler posts about Hamlets on film will know that I originally had... a slight aversion to this particular film, for a reason I'm not entirely sure of anymore. I
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Reply
LOL, your friend. At least she was willing to watch it with you? (None of mine are.)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
(I think I asked you this before, but is this a Shakespeare-on-film class, a Hamlet class, a Hamlet-on-film class, or...?)
Yeah. I mean, I don't mind it, it's just a little awkward. Especially because it's a business, not just a modern royal family, so there's that extra layer of alienation. I've seen a trailer for an independent film Hamlet that takes out all aspects of state and makes it pure family drama, and the language seemed to work just fine -- then again, "family drama" is timeless whereas "corporation" or even "royalty" isn't.
Reply
Heh. This is always my first reaction to this film, no matter how many times I've had to watch it.
Reply
Also, did they specifically instruct Hawke not to wash his hair for a month? Because that's what it looks like.
Reply
I even think I have it on the pc °_°! Laertes/Hamlet subtext? YUM!
Reply
...Oh, snap. *looks at title* Did I really write 2009? I did, didn't I? XD What I, erm, MEANT to write was Hamlet 2000, the one with Ethan Hawke. HOWEVER, the 2009 one with David Tennant is at least twice as good as the 2000 version, and what it lacks in Hamlet/Laertes it makes up for in Hamlet/Horatio, so you should watch it immediately!
Reply
Leave a comment