The fault would be with your attacker, of course. While it might not be wise to be in a dark alley/stair well you're being there is NOT an invitation to be attacked. Contrary to popular belief, people can be expected to have restraint and not harm their fellow humans in any way.
I have a question about your scenario. Why do you not hold the man responsible for his actions? He is the individual who (presumably) stripped and (certainly) penetrated his victim. It seems like you are saying a man can't be expected to refrain from having sex, that a man somehow can't control his penis. Just because a woman is unconcious doesn't mean she is there for the taking; if it did women everywhere would be afraid to sleep o.O. Or are you suggesting that the girl in question is awake and aware of what is happening? I think what confuses most people by your scenario is the implicit suggestion that a man would OF COURSE have the the right to have sex with a woman and, dang it all, it's not his fault if she's not awake to say no.
No, I said he wasn't guilt free. And if it wasn't read that way I appologize. I don't really care to discuss it anymore. I'm sure I will recieve more e-mails about what a heartless bastard I am anyways, but I would like to cut it down a bit.
Comments 11
Reply
The fault would be with your attacker, of course. While it might not be wise to be in a dark alley/stair well you're being there is NOT an invitation to be attacked. Contrary to popular belief, people can be expected to have restraint and not harm their fellow humans in any way.
Reply
Reply
Reply
See, the post I made answers stupid shit like this. Now you know why I gave up. People are fucking crazy.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment