so, for those of you who watched the game yesterday, you'll know that it wasn't without its fair share of drama. yes, there were dives (on both sides!) and probably trash-talking (also on both sides), but i found it to be a pretty exciting game despite that. the italians dominated the first half, and then they lost their legs. the second half
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
But really Zinadine... what made that a good idea? Did you think France didn't need you for the next ten minutes? Did you think there were five guys who should all be taking PKs instead of you? Completely disregarding the mean-spiritedness, what made that a good idea in terms of France winning, or in terms of how you'll be remembered for the next 30 years?
On a related note, early on I was sad that, if France won because of that first totally undeserved PK early on, it wouldn't be fair. Fortunately Zambrotta more than made up for it with his own dive (in his own box? Isn't that backwards?) and then a horrendous foul in the box that wasn't called later on. That made it all seema lot fairer.
Reply
anyway, i think zidane will ultimately be remembered more for what he brought to the game than how he left it. which, i suppose, is the way it should be. after all, even i have to concede that he is quite a player. but i really think he should explain himself to the public before little kids all over the world start thinking, "hey, he head butted a guy and still got the golden ball...that must mean what he did was A-OK."
Reply
Reply
Reply
lunga
Reply
Leave a comment