procrastinating? little old me?

May 31, 2006 21:56

Random Things I Write Down In My Little Black Notebook While At Some Museum And Stick In My Purse to be Found Later, #7412.30.05 ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 13

arisrabkin June 1 2006, 03:18:07 UTC
I don't think I commented on the sovereignty thing at the time, so I'll remedy that here.

I think sovereignty is a good thing, and to the extent that it's been eroding in many (not all) parts of the world, that's going to be problematic. Sovereignty was invented to clarify who was in charge, and the middle ages were violent and chaotic in large part because there wasn't any such clarity.

Also, I'm skeptical of the author's explanation for the breakdown in orderly government throughout the world. I don't think either global capitalism or technology is the problem: there are many high-tech places without any such erosion, and many of the most chaotic places have been bypassed by global capitalism.

Reply

dragonladyflame June 5 2006, 06:23:25 UTC
I couldn't read the whole article because I don't have the required subscription ... but I'm not sure I actually know where I come down in the debate. My instincts are to say that I don't know enough to have an opinion. It's an interesting thing to think about nonetheless, though.

Reply


Do you always write this well? worldnamer June 1 2006, 15:01:24 UTC
...nothing I created of him could be worse or less accurate than the things I have dreamed my actual lovers to be.

Staggering, beautiful.

Reply

Do I? dragonladyflame June 5 2006, 06:19:51 UTC
You'd know better than I -- you're one of my best readers. :smile: I feel like you and I are on the exact same wavelength in some very fundamental ways.

And thank you.

Reply


epinicion June 2 2006, 06:03:23 UTC
Now that was truly beautiful. Sometime I'm going to have to write down the thoughts that went through my head when first I saw you on the L.

Reply

dragonladyflame June 5 2006, 06:18:35 UTC
Heh. Flatterer.

Reply

epinicion June 7 2006, 15:20:04 UTC
Prove me wrong. ; )

Reply


basseykay June 2 2006, 14:04:48 UTC
I haven't checked the sources, but I suspect that the DNA story is a mistake. The title and the caption to the photo mention DNA but the text of the story only says that certain genes are activated. The text does not mention DNA. My guess is that the DNA is the same either way, but some other change outside of the DNA determines which sequences of DNA are read.

Reply

bloodofchrist June 3 2006, 12:57:49 UTC
i so wanted to be the first to point that out ...
but yea, turning on or off genes doesn't change the DNA at all; it just affects which genes are translated into proteins.

if i don't get distracted, i think we might get endocrinology at work. i'll try to find the original article.

Reply

dragonladyflame June 5 2006, 06:17:45 UTC
Well, that's what I figured. But I guess it's not quite scientifically correct to say that changing DNA's expression is "changing DNA".

Reply


milliganhasears June 2 2006, 16:39:12 UTC
Lovely. Now I'm going to have Magic Dance running in my head all day. Which isn't to say that I don't think a goblin masquerade would rock, but muppet wire-fu is catchier.

Reply

dragonladyflame June 5 2006, 06:18:21 UTC
:grin: Would you attend a Fiery-themed ball?

Reply

milliganhasears June 7 2006, 00:35:26 UTC
Now that could be interesting. I predict friskier dancing, and an anomalously large chance of getting kicked in the head.

Yes!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up