I have issues with the term "white trash". I find it offensive and racist. To me, having to qualify a particular piece of trash as being white implies that normal trash is not white, which in turn sort of implies that not white = trash. I am aware of the logical fallacy, so please don't bother to point that out. I am also aware that perhaps I
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
Regardless, it's an awful term. Almost as bad as referring to an article of clothing as a 'wifebeater' Ick ick ick.
Reply
I would not normally utter or expect to hear "He's just trash", and the implication I take from your reaction is that you would.
I think that I would require a complementary modifier like black, brown, or Irish to get the same metaphorical sense of trash, absent contextual preparation, so the implications that bother you are absent for me. That is, there is no "normal" trash, in this sense, for me, distinct from white trash.
*It's not, though. English compounds are diagnosed by stress patterns: BLACKbird v. a black BIRD. I don't say "WHITE trash". But it is a fixed phrase, and that tends to block constituent parsing for me.
Reply
Interesting observation.
Reply
Wikipedia claims it's ok now because of the stress pattern. But wikipedia didn't even know about the hookworm thing, so what good are they?
Reply
Reply
hopeshopeshopes
Reply
What I generally mean is "people who use their economic disadvantage as an excuse to remain willfully ignorant and behave accordingly, for example by hatin' on Yankees, hardworking Mexicans, people who believe in the scientific method, women with better-paying jobs than they've got, homosexuals, art films, and/or tofu", but that's not sufficiently pithy.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment