Chrome OS

Nov 24, 2009 14:16

I downloaded the new pre-release of Google's Chrome OS, and I'm honestly not sure what to think. It's just an internet browser. Apparently, they're planning on making all applications integrate with this browser system, but so far... just a browser. I have to say that I'm kind of puzzled as to why they would release it at all, given that it only ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 13

blackeagle2138 November 24 2009, 21:29:26 UTC
It sounds like you're saying something equivalent to "Linux boots really quickly if you remove all those pesky packages & daemons" Which... yeah. That sounds like a pre-alpha release.

Reply

draque November 26 2009, 06:52:55 UTC
Yeah, that's pretty mu8ch it. ^^()

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

draque November 26 2009, 06:53:39 UTC
Like I said, I'm not really sure why they bothered putting this one out. I'll be curious to see where they take it from here.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

draque November 26 2009, 06:54:55 UTC
Yeah... that's pretty much where I'm caught up on as well. Maybe they're holding a lot back that isn't in this one? I dunno. not really a very good showing on their part.

Reply


_dw November 25 2009, 14:04:52 UTC
The NC, redux?

Reply

draque November 26 2009, 06:55:11 UTC
NC??

Reply

_dw November 27 2009, 15:28:46 UTC
The Network Computer. Nothing on the computer, everything on the network, remember?

Reply


chaoseven November 25 2009, 23:07:01 UTC
Just a browser, Draque? Really? Just a regular, run-of-the-mill browser? That an epic POWERHAUS of innovation like Google laboriously shat out like so much afterbirth of better, more notable applications?

I guess you're right. They're not all diamonds.

TL:DR http://www.our-picks.com/archives/2007/02/06/firefox-can-be-faster-4-easy-tricks/

Reply

draque November 26 2009, 06:59:02 UTC
Huh... I honestly can't tell if the text on that page was run through a translator and back again, or if whoever wrote it is just hard to follow. ^^()

Reply

chaoseven November 27 2009, 22:10:56 UTC
And I am unsure as to whether you're inferring the linked article, or the reply in whole. :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up