I know they exist....

Oct 03, 2007 17:31

Can someone (anybody?) explain to me the differences between, say, Taoism and Buddhism?

Leave a comment

Comments 8

midnightfae October 3 2007, 21:42:53 UTC
A very long story short, Taoism is based on balance. If you want more information, you can read the Tao te Ching, but, long story short, all things are should be balanced by it's opposite. Male/Female, Light/Dark, Good/Evil... and enlightenment lies in that balance.

Buddhism is based on the teaching of the Buddha. Life is suffering, enlightment is escaping life. The cause of that suffering is desire. You eliminate the desire, you reach enlightenment, you stop reincarnating in a world of pain and differing.

This is like.... Eastern Religions for first graders, but it's simple and too the point. Help any?

Reply

drawsmcgraw October 6 2007, 14:14:28 UTC
Helps a bit. I've thumbed through the Tao de Ching and have read the Tao of Pooh (neat read, actually) and while going through some other literature I just see a lot of similarities between the two ways of life. Probably because they're both ancient Eastern philosophies...

Reply

midnightfae October 7 2007, 06:56:05 UTC
It's likely because they both developed in the the same-ish areas, and there are cultural similarities. Similar cultures = similar religions. *shrugs* Just the way people work.

Reply


usagi629 October 20 2007, 13:45:38 UTC
Sorry, I don't know a great deal on either...

Misti mentioned that you two might venture to Rennfest this weekend. We're going today. Ring us if you decide to go. We'd love to see you both.

Happy Anniversary Too!! (I think?)

Reply

drawsmcgraw October 22 2007, 22:24:18 UTC
Well, I don't feel too bad that I didn't see this until today, we wound up going on Sunday. And thanks for the happy wishes! Yes, it was yesterday.

Reply


IM in ur LJ, talkin Eastern Philosophy. saint_of_me March 3 2010, 17:17:40 UTC
Taoism is older than Buddhism. Taoism says that if you feel the need to make a law, then disorder already reigns and it's kind of pointless to make the law. It says that ignorance is bliss, and knowledge leads to evil. Taoism says that we must all follow the way of nature, the natural flow of things. There's no messiah in Taoism. No salvation. There's magic, and there's an afterlife (the bardo, I think) but there's nothing saying that if you read up on all the stuff the gurus wrote that you'll become a better person better capable of dealing with the universe. I mean, sure, you can think that you know what's what, but if you really do then it's only because you've become syncronized with the nature of existence ( ... )

Reply

Re: IM in ur LJ, talkin Eastern Philosophy. drawsmcgraw March 4 2010, 01:13:32 UTC
That makes Taoism sound.... defeatist? This is a new interpretation on it that I've not heard before. I'm trying to map this description onto the vinegar tasters and I can see that working. I believe that ignorance is bliss, but to willingly enter into that state of ignorance...?

Reply

Re: IM in ur LJ, talkin Eastern Philosophy. saint_of_me March 30 2010, 16:54:58 UTC
How about this...it's not really ignorance ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up