Hugo Puppies

Apr 06, 2015 08:54

I shall not rehash the Sad/Rabid Puppies Hugo award debacle here - the best summary is probably Mike Glyer's, here. I want to move on to possible solutions ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 15

nwhyte April 6 2015, 13:19:52 UTC
Mike - very thoughtful, thanks!

Last year that would have given us 5 rather than 4 on the Short Story shortlist, and a massive 14 on Best Dramatic Presentation (Long Form), also 9 for Best Editor (Short Form), 6 for Best Editor (Long Form) and Best a Professional Artist, 7 for Best Fanzine, 6 for Best Fanwriter and 7 for Best Artist, and everything else still on 5.

The effect is to broaden the number of nominees in a category where the front-runner is way ahead, which isn't quite the same as neutralising a slate, but may have the same effect.

It has a pleasing simplicity though. I wonder if 10% is right?

Reply


daveon April 6 2015, 15:44:58 UTC
With respect to the BDP Long Form, I'm not entirely sure that a non-puppies version would look all that much different from this one. There might have been some of the more interesting movies on it with this form but I'm not sure.

Reply


matociquala April 6 2015, 16:05:29 UTC
This seems like the most workable proposal of those I've seen, but I'm not sure about the 10% rule. Especially in widely scattered fields like Short Fiction, 5% is too high for a full ballot at this point.

And I think it could still be gamed.

Reply


stevegreen April 6 2015, 19:25:48 UTC
Fascinating suggestion, Mike.

Reply


daveon April 6 2015, 23:48:50 UTC
Why do you need to rank all votes? It's a variant on list voting then, you rank your top picks only? Or have I missed something there?

Reply

drplokta April 7 2015, 06:08:49 UTC
You don't have to rank every nominee, but you may want to.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up