WMD's and other fun toys

Apr 27, 2004 21:37

Lets start first things first ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 18

Jeff say's.... anonymous April 27 2004, 19:20:41 UTC
Tony I dont think I even have a response to this. There are far far too many things wrong with this post.

Just one thing. No one said it was to please Daddy. In Bush seniors memoirs he states that a protrcated war with Iraq is a horrible idea and it would result in all the problems we face now.
Bush went in because he is a tool and totally pwn3d by oil companies such as Haliburton. Also he wanted vengance for daddy and since he's illiterate ergo unable to take his fathers advice he did what his father advised not too. He entered into a dick measuring contest, launching phallic shaped objects at a country that WASN'T AN IMMINENT THREAT AND HAS NO PROVEN CONNECTIONS TO AL QUEDA. Also if this is your reason for going to war, what about North Korea? They announced they were starting a nuclear arms program.We did nothing (this can be explained asians must have smaller penis's or phallices or equal size)

Finally Liberals do vote and Bush stole the election.
Sorry for the incoherent rant but it's late.

Reply


rage_patriot April 28 2004, 04:58:54 UTC
Ok Jeff, it's time for pwnage ( ... )

Reply

Jeff says rage_patriot April 28 2004, 15:48:37 UTC
Hey the last article was supposed to be funny but if you want to do a count counterpoint thing here lets go ( ... )

Reply


dogmai April 28 2004, 15:40:08 UTC
although i dont agree with the war in iraq, you do prove a valid point. there were deadly chemicals found in Iraq, but unfortunately, bush and his advisors said WMD refering specifically to nuclear arms.

the war wasnt entirely for oil, but only a nieve media receptor would try and say it had no part in it. the reason the oil prices are jacked up is cause the iraqi national army used a scorched earth policy and burned oil wells. we've spent a good deal repairing them and the like.

as for Al-Quida, well, i havent seen too much proof that they worked with the iraqi govt. its just about a hatred for the western world. thats the only reason they would EVER work together. and if thats the only reason we're accusing, why not attack france. they seem to oppose us, via recent events.

You can call Bush stupid all you want, but more than half of the country supports him. If you call Bush stupid that would mean you are calling half the country stupid. And to me that is rather a "stupid" thing to think.unfortunately there is a GIANT flaw with ( ... )

Reply

rage_patriot April 28 2004, 18:36:59 UTC
Bush and his advisors cited one reference to Iraq trying to by nuclear material from a country in Africa (forgot which one). Tony Blair still stands by his countries intelligence. The focus was around biological and chemical weapons ( ... )

Reply


Ant posting anonymous April 28 2004, 16:49:11 UTC

Article continued... anonymous April 28 2004, 16:50:31 UTC
"Saddam Hussein's prohibited missile programs are as close to a slam dunk as you will ever find for violating United Nations resolutions," the first official said. Both senior administration officials spoke to Insight on condition that neither their name nor their agency be identified, but their accounts of what the United States has found in Iraq coincided in every major area ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up