This may bring back a similar question going around back after the dot com bomb. Why is the recovery largely jobless? Back in 2000 I wondered if the world had become similar to the US in that the geography of jobs is uneven. By this, I mean that you can have less unions and tax breaks in the South and this leads to companies and jobs moving to
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
A)Most people own a bunch of crap already, they don't really need more than five TVs
B)Many people have no job because most of the jobs went away.
C)New businesses fail because they can't provide anything that isn't already stacked to the roof in the (Best Buy, Target, WalMart, etc) warehouse.
D)New businesses can't compete against the vast corporate monsters that already dominate the marketplace with volume discounts. (This would apply to goods and services)
With no consumer buying power to clear out the stockpiles, domestic demand for new business product is not just low, it's ultra-low. Most people would be relying on the government to support them with SOME kind of program. If the government can get their latest stimulus to the people in the form of employment (temp or not) they might have a chance. Otherwise, tent city here we come.
Reply
Of course, capitalism requiring refuse is nothing new. I was once a part of a reading group looking at this connection.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment