What is feminism? What's a "strong female character"?

Jul 11, 2008 00:48

Apparently--{spoken in dry tones} thoughts on strong, scifi female characters have been on my mind, A LOT, so I'm posting my response to pellucid's recent entry.  (I won't torture her by linking to it.)

I think that our "love of literature," or fannish love of television, begins when we start having a relationship with these (strong, female) ( Read more... )

metafic

Leave a comment

Comments 17

zaleti July 11 2008, 14:24:35 UTC
Ok, I really need to sleep but I couldn't resist...
I think loopholes and weaknesses certainly encourage fanfiction, because of the need to complete things, and because fans of a character will, of course, want to see them well-rounded. Stating the obvious here, but who doesn't wish we got a little more Roslin background? We know odd details, but many of these have had to be taken from external sources. Researched, in other words. (Whereas, Adama? Different matter.) There are some great fics out there that do believable (and not improbably tragic) backstory for Roslin.

In a character-driven show like BSG, with a big ensemble, it's easy to feel cheated if one's 'favourite', perhaps, is denied the fleshing-out of their backstory that they deserve. Thus, fanfic: it fills the gaps. Whether it's good or not depends chiefly on (a) how much character there is to work with in the first place (as you say); and (b) how much analysis and thought has gone into it. Sorry, that's blunt. But it's also true... :D ( ... )

Reply

egeria61 July 11 2008, 15:43:45 UTC
I really must check out NCIS. I followed that link you sent me, and discovered that it's in its 5th season. *gulp* Good to know other stuff is out there, though!

I think Roslin's coldness is part of her plan to save humanity. It's what has to be done and she does what's needed, whether she likes it or not. But she, personally, suffers for it. I don't think she enjoys the extreme tilt of her personality towards the "rational," or "cold," or (maybe even?) the "calculating."

But at some point, the calculations draw her attention back to herself. I think her return to her "softer" side, is actually the logical result of these "cold" calculations. Because LET'S DO THE MATH. How many survivors of the nuclear holocaust remain? ("How do we measure loss?") With so many gone, they start counting those who remain. She can't save humanity without also saving herself.

You've reminded me of something else. *goes to edit this entry* Example of a loophole in BSG that's productive for fanfic: the "missing" year on New Caprica.

Reply


theastolat July 11 2008, 14:37:44 UTC
The idea of a 'strong female character' differs not only from person to person, but from day to day within the community. Any character will fall short of the unreasonable expectations associated with a SFC ( ... )

Reply

egeria61 July 11 2008, 15:51:47 UTC
Oh, that's interesting! I think realism is important, if you want the audience to identify with the FC. Realism within science fiction is a beautiful thing, because when it's well done, you can have realistic, everyday characters talking to demons and aliens. It makes the heroic something touchable, something present in the everyday. And, it makes us re-look at the everyday as if it were unfamiliar. *Hugs you*

Reply


My insanely long comment, inspired by your captivating blog entry, read at your own peril metatxt July 25 2008, 02:16:12 UTC
OK I have wayyyy too many thoughts running around in my head after reading this ( ... )

Reply

Re: My insanely long comment, inspired by your captivating blog entry, read at your own peril egeria61 July 27 2008, 12:32:42 UTC
I like your criteria! Looking at these issues in context is at the heart of applying knowledge and theory strategically, and appropriately. This is, by the way, a very demanding set of criteria (which makes me cling to it with wild abandon). It makes sense to see how the character participates in the overall ethos of the show, how she advances the plot, and how she influences other characters on the show. (By the way, one of my favorite things about Roslin is how she influences Adama's thinking. It's a sign that she IS a "strong female character." Of course, it's much better when Adama actually CREDITS Roslin when he uses her words, or her line of reasoning (A to Tigh: "we need to start having babies" or A to Starbuck: "I know she is. The President. I'm tired of losing.")

I wonder if that's also the way to approach the "Strong Female Characters" in Scifi question. I'm (more than a little) hung up on the resemblances and lack thereof between female characters. I see that you lose something in the process of taking these ( ... )

Reply

Re: My insanely long comment, inspired by your captivating blog entry, read at your own peril metatxt July 31 2008, 20:42:58 UTC
Demanding criteria makes me swoon too :D

Yes! that is the best part about Roslin and Adama. I hate when characters supposedly exist in a vacuum, as if their relationship has no bearing on their perspective or growth. Roslin is genius. She so totally owns me.

I really like your breakdown, besides linking disparate characters, it moves SciFi out of the ghetto, putting characterization and thematics first, and superficial setting second. OMG I cannot WAIT for the new LR inspired characters. Even though she's more morally grey than Roslin, I wonder if Adelle DeWitt in Dollhouse will be one of those characters.

Reply

Re: My insanely long comment, inspired by your captivating blog entry, read at your own peril egeria61 August 1 2008, 01:54:21 UTC
putting characterization and thematics first, and superficial setting second Hadn't thought of that before! So it doesn't matter as much whether a SFC plays a "traditional" or a "professional" role. That's exciting, as is talking to you. (Dude, it's like oxygen in a stuffy room.)

Reply


metatxt July 25 2008, 02:17:46 UTC
As for fannish devotion: interesting ideas! I definitely agree. Although, I wonder if it isn't more cyclical? that characters who find a way to transcend our own boundaries of fiction and reality, by engaging our own personal lived experience, grow that fannish devotion? I wonder because there are very real limitations in developing a relationship with a character, and yet there has to be some reciprocity for it to be a relationship, and not idolatry. I'm guessing we're saying the same thing. Just needed to hammer some of it out for my own understanding :P ( ... )

Reply

egeria61 August 1 2008, 02:01:30 UTC
characters who find a way to transcend our own boundaries of fiction and reality, by engaging our own personal lived experience, grow that fannish devotion. This is interesting. I also wonder if fannish devotion grows as we interact with other fans online. The reciprocity problem is intriguing, because I desperately want to find a way to distinguish fannish devotion from idolatry. (Though they're not mutually exclusive, of course.)

You're right, and I should rephrase. I don't think poor characterization is good for fanfiction. But I do think loopholes and gaps in the timeline can be. (Speaking from very limited experience here, so I'm referring only to the "year on New Caprica" fanfics that I've read.) ;D

Reply

metatxt August 1 2008, 18:25:29 UTC
I also wonder if fannish devotion grows as we interact with other fans online. I think so! Ooooh ok so what if interacting with other fans means social permission to express your fannishness, and self-expression inherently changes your level of investment/the nature of the relationship.

I desperately want to find a way to distinguish fannish devotion from idolatry Me too... obv. I'm leaning towards reciprocity, but I think that's contentious enough not to be a singular answer. Inevitably you bump up against issues of fandom, character, real life fans, and the real life actors. And the real life people do exchange a type of give and take about the fannishness in general. Though I think it's got to be different depending on if you're dealing with real life actors or real life writers in book fandom, just by the nature of how you consume the actual work. I keep thinking of Katee Sackhoff's up and down fan relationship vs. JK Rowling's up and down fan relationship. Guuh this is starting to sound like thesis work to hammer it all out.

... )

Reply

egeria61 August 1 2008, 20:17:36 UTC
in SCC, the best work actually incorporates thematic issues that are canon BSG (cuz robot commonalities) but the actual SCC show doesn't get into. Wow! That's fascinating! Do you recommend watching the SCC? I've never watched an episode, but have heard mixed reviews of it.

On real life actors and real life fans. I was actually thinking that there's some reciprocity between fellow lj fans who interact online, rather than between the actors and the fans in real life. I would actually be quite nervous about meeting rl actors (oh, say, MMD). Even though it would be awesome, I don't know how much reciprocity one could get out of such a brief meeting. So I'm wondering if the "interaction" one has with "the character" is channeled through lj and other online mediums. It's an indirect way of "interacting" with the character (when you're really interacting with other fans' perceptions of the character ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up