So I'm reading the posts made by several people on the new "Bear Magazine" kerfluffle (the whole "what is a bear?" thing with them siding that the fatter guys are ruining it for the musclebears) and thought I'd throw something out there
(
Read more... )
Comments 16
Reply
Reply
Thanks for that nicely written essay. It's a good reminder that a lot of the porn out there is about fantasy caricatures, not real people. And I do include my own company, CyberBears, in that mix.
We aim to show a wide variety of men playing together, and we try to match men up who have different body types, shapes, and colors, but also have a genuine interest in each other. And yes, it has proven to be a successful formula for our target audience. I think part of that success comes from how our focus on contrasting types playing together leaves room in the mix for the viewer's own fantasies. But there will always be an element of projection in how viewers interact with our products.
Even when a porn company tries to limit its scope, whether it's through strict selection or post-processing, there's always a lot of variation that comes to the surface. I tend to think those attempts to narrow the focus makes viewers more aware of the differences among the models rather than on the iconic image in their fantasies. Good thing there are lots ( ... )
Reply
I do think Cyberbears does just fine, and I wish you much success. Every company is welcome to market the way they see fit, but I think the new Bear is backing themselves into a corner. How many men can actually live up to their standards. Will they all need photoshopping? Fantasy and perfection, sure obtainable? No.
Best to you!
Reply
P.s., just found your blog so I'm reading through old articles.
Reply
I don't post as much as i used to!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment