of clones and what notarchiedavisMay 8 2001, 13:49:47 UTC
i would be ok with the idea of cloning for one reason, and one reason only... to be able to have sex with myself... would that technically be masturbation? since it IS me after all
( ... )
ha ha...winston winston winston...what am i to do with you....
well, if you read what i wrote, you read that all of the occurences in the previous life, of the clone, were downloaded into the "new" person. hence making it the same person, with the same memories, therefore making the pasts of both one in the same... ultimately negating your idea that they would be a different person because of different invironment...
also consider this....the clone could be made much like frankenstein, fully grown. or only a seed at the beginning, and grow as "normal" humans do. in that case, i have to agree with you, that they would be entirely different.....indeed
unless of course....
if you meant after the second life....once again though, they would have the memories of the first ...or original person....
not that it makes a fuck...or that my ideas/thoughts are realistic.....just thought i would clear my perception up for ya...
still, that would be dangerous as all get out i think... all manner of super-brained beasts running about, on holy terrors, and what not... but what about the degeneration of the brain tissue and and what not... what exactly is the brain going to be "downloaded" to? standard computer programs cant come even close to the complexities of the human brain...
oh, wait...this is pure conjecture here isnt it... um... lets give us wings and ivisibility first. they would be funner than us just being old.
Mary Shelly's FrankensteinwesterneyesMay 8 2001, 14:24:29 UTC
The first time I read Frankenstein was my junior year in highschool, and I was truly stunned as well. I'd seen a million different versions of the story on television and in movies, and here was the original outdoing all of them. I didn't find it boring at all. Aside from a lot of Shakespeare, that was my favorite book read by assignment, and second only to William Golding's Lord of the Flies.
Comments 6
Reply
well, if you read what i wrote, you read that all of the occurences in the previous life, of the clone, were downloaded into the "new" person. hence making it the same person, with the same memories, therefore making the pasts of both one in the same... ultimately negating your idea that they would be a different person because of different invironment...
also consider this....the clone could be made much like frankenstein, fully grown. or only a seed at the beginning, and grow as "normal" humans do. in that case, i have to agree with you, that they would be entirely different.....indeed
unless of course....
if you meant after the second life....once again though, they would have the memories of the first ...or original person....
not that it makes a fuck...or that my ideas/thoughts are realistic.....just thought i would clear my perception up for ya...
Reply
oh, wait...this is pure conjecture here isnt it... um... lets give us wings and ivisibility first. they would be funner than us just being old.
Reply
cloning humans...
there is no way for them to download human brains..its just thier "plan"
Reply
The first time I read Frankenstein was my junior year in highschool, and I was truly stunned as well. I'd seen a million different versions of the story on television and in movies, and here was the original outdoing all of them. I didn't find it boring at all. Aside from a lot of Shakespeare, that was my favorite book read by assignment, and second only to William Golding's Lord of the Flies.
Reply
Leave a comment