Leave a comment

Comments 4

chacals March 12 2011, 12:53:56 UTC
First of all, if answering this question was such a waste of time, I'm honestly tempted to ask why you bothered writing so much down. But that's not the point.

Because of the way the earth's now tilting, signs have change, though I don't know by how much. (It's enough that I was a Taurus, born may 10th, but now I'm at the end of Aries.) No one's really bothering with the "new" signs, because why change something that's been around since forever?

Point: the signs have changed. Does anyone care? Not really.

Reply

elissa_carey March 12 2011, 13:00:18 UTC
Western astrology is Tropical, not Sidereal.

I bothered answering because the question bothered the fuck out of me. I tend to speak out when I am bothered.

Reply

shendoah March 12 2011, 16:54:45 UTC
Because I'm Western, and therefor follow the Western Signs, was born on a cusp and often display more Taurus like traits than Gemini I concur wholeheartedly with your assessment.

However there are SOME people who follow the Sidereal Astrological signs. But honestly, if they followed Sidereal in the first place, they were not taken by surprise at a changed sign, they already knew what their sign was with the shifting of the earth, so it didn't change.

In the end, still a lame question based on lack of clarity of the situation.

Reply

pierceheart March 15 2011, 18:17:10 UTC
Point: the signs have changed.

No, they haven't.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up