Disparagingly Didactic Derision

Aug 17, 2005 16:42

I just wanted to save this because I bothered to type it all up merely to insult the parties at whom it was directed. Feel free to read it if you'd like but I am adding it here for my convenience and/or for posterity.



Still your fingers you insidious insignificant pissant. My critique (hey you spelled that word right!) of "Mandy's" journal was an untroublesome vocation by which I scrutinized the archetypal chronicle memorandum juxtaposed to the explication transliterated (in its obstinately colloquial neologistical drivel) by "Mandy". That being articulated, upon further perusal of the aforementioned tabularium adiunctum, I espied unequivocal indicia that concomitantly corroborated the quintessential supposition of a singular but inchoative correspondent, not two.

Now, do you, young Aaron, still think it is sad to "critique every small detail about a journal entry" when grammatical excellence comes so easily to your superiors, id est geniuses such as myself? I majored in English and you can count high enough to surpass the number of books I've read. Sure, I come off as arrogant and I may be tooting my own horn here; but don't assume that everyone finds the same difficulty that you would find in analyzing a journal entry and comparing it to the responses below it.

Begin Condescending English Lessons

If you don't want mistakes like this to be made, then use a fucking apostrophe now and again. Let me show you what it looks like:

'
See it just above?? That's called an "apostrophe" and it is commonly known to do two things in the English language (at least American English grammatical structure).

The first is to make contractions. Contractions are two or three (though typically two) words that you put together to form one word. Typically this is done in vocalized expression. Here is your example sentence: "Aaron/Mandy is so dumb s/he won't be able to understand seventy-five percent of the words I've used in my first paragraph."

The second use of the apostrophe is to show ownership. Rather than saying "the paws of the cat", we can abbreviate it as "the cat's paws". Here is your example sentence: "Mandy's asshole has been fucked so much that whenever Aaron's whimpy voice squeaks into it cacophonies of shrill echos can be heard for several moments on end."

There are other uses of the apostrophe, especially when dealing with British grammatical structure, but I've gone over enough for today. Next week: the (;) semi-colon.

End Condescending English Lessons

By the way, I find it extremely difficult to believe that you would have the mental capacity to "purposely made it looks like Mandy wrote it", as you said. By the way, the word you were looking for there was "purposefully" not "purposely". Though either word is acceptable, "purposely" wasn't even considered a word until idiots like you began to use it in everyday language. You and your kind are fucking up our beautiful language.

And don't think I've wasted my time typing this up. It came as a breeze to me and furthermore will provide unending laughter from intelligent individuals like most of my friends, including Jasmine. In all honesty, I could insult you in the English language with words you've never heard (archaic at that) and you'd have no idea that I had. (One quick example... Aaron and Mandy, your aggregate sagacity is homologous to that of a glebe of ruminating neat.)

If you do spend the time to read it, feel free to leave a comment on it or whatever.
Previous post Next post
Up