The linked paper and resulting discussion in this metafilter thread came to mind upon reading your post.
Which is to say: Word.
Sometimes I think hyperfocus on language and political correctness retarded actual discussion about race - created this artificial goal where if nobody ever uses slurs in public, then we've "solved" racism. (Of course we can't even manage to clear that laughably low hurdle.)
I'm thinking of something slightly different from the post you linked to. I don't think there's anything wrong with being careful about language to avoid offending people. I just think that a lot of people who pointedly avoid using ethnic slurs think that doing so means they're not racist.
The focus on language without any critical examination of why language matters is a hurdle. Its a solution that is reached by people just starting out with anti-racism. Our first instinct as allies is to say "what do I do?" and watching our language is one thing we can do. The problem is that we tend (general "we") to find something to do that makes us comfortable, and a disturbing amount of people are comfortable just trying not to offend anyone without digging deeper into why.
Comments 9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbwNSNLPIfw
Reply
Which is to say: Word.
Sometimes I think hyperfocus on language and political correctness retarded actual discussion about race - created this artificial goal where if nobody ever uses slurs in public, then we've "solved" racism. (Of course we can't even manage to clear that laughably low hurdle.)
Reply
What do you think of this post?
http://www.kaichang.net/2006/11/the_sloppy_prop.html
Reply
I'm thinking of something slightly different from the post you linked to. I don't think there's anything wrong with being careful about language to avoid offending people. I just think that a lot of people who pointedly avoid using ethnic slurs think that doing so means they're not racist.
Reply
Reply
Reply
This makes for interesting reading.
Reply
Leave a comment