XServe RAID 2: This is a no brainer. The existing XServe RAID is using a variety of drive that is otherwise only found in entry level computers manufactured 2 years ago. Now, don't get me wrong, it's a nice storage solution, but it could be much more. Here you go:
Actually, I don't know anything, but I do know our server guy would sell his girlfriend to the gypsies for SAS in the RAID. I think 10.5 will read ZFS, but it's not supported as a boot option, which kinds sucks. Naturally I'd rather have BeFS than anything, but good luck with that (despite the fact that the developer of BeFS is on the OS team...)
ZFS needs to get in somewhere as an option, because I am getting KILLED for HFS+'s lack of snapshotting. And, frankly, I'm tired of hearing about it. Not that I think it's terribly terribly important in a lot of cases (if a file is open for writing when you do a backup, whether it gets copied incompletely or not at all, you're basically in the same boat -- but I do recognize some legit cases). It may come down to either EMC one of those SAN guys getting a lot of money, or Apple getting a lot of money, and although I can put together an XServe and XServe RAID solution for 1/2 to 1/3 of those guys, lack of buzzword compliance may sink the plan
( ... )
Comments 4
Actually, I don't know anything, but I do know our server guy would sell his girlfriend to the gypsies for SAS in the RAID. I think 10.5 will read ZFS, but it's not supported as a boot option, which kinds sucks. Naturally I'd rather have BeFS than anything, but good luck with that (despite the fact that the developer of BeFS is on the OS team...)
Reply
Reply
I don't understand your silly computer talk. Just stop it right now.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment