Two things about SGA 4x05, Travelers

Oct 30, 2007 23:20

This post and comments have moved to dreamwidth.

Leave a comment

Comments 59

cathexys October 31 2007, 04:34:00 UTC
OMG..it makes SO MUCH SENSE!!!!!

beautiful!

i'm getting off on both your minds just WATCHING YOU THINK.

Look...no hands! just thinking and gazing :D

[i do want to think a bit more about the gendering of the ancients and the wraith, b/c interestingly the mind/body dichotomy is mostly inverted, isn't it? i mean, there's a female wraith queen here and there, but the named character wraith whom John encounters are all male, right? And the ancients we encounter tend to be female???

b/c i like the queered transgendered wraith versus the asexual ancients...except it's a bit too tracking the vampire, a bit too monstrous queerness and edelman's death drive for me... after all, the pleasure is *not* in the sucking but in the returning of life...and now i'm lost... :)]

Reply

eruthros October 31 2007, 05:21:08 UTC
Yeah, no, totally, I think that's kinda our point! Because the show starts out with this really straightforward TOTALLY structuralist oppositional thing, but. But but. Then it gets all messed with -- the Wraith in season one = monstrous queerness, but now something else is going on ( ... )

Reply

cathexys October 31 2007, 05:30:08 UTC
resituates John and Larrin within their bodies, so that their queerness is simultaneously about recognition of sameness, and about the ways in which bodies matter. yeah, see, I kinda like that reading better, and it totally jibes with my reading of always...which, i was totally thinking of when i was reading your analysis, b/c it's about sameness and about experiencing the same thing and about creating comunity via commonality...

and 'im with you about the bed going, so more on monstrous females tomorrow :D

Reply

eruthros October 31 2007, 12:13:26 UTC
Well, I think what I was trying to do was to say: look, you can take any of these readings, the one that talks about the structure of the episode and the barred heterosexuality, the one that talks about John as man-and-machine, the one that talks about the Wraith as queered bodies, or the one that talks about the Wraith as the monstrous queer ... and in all of them, this scene is a queer(ed) scene. In all of them, John is a queer(ed) body. So that at all of these different levels, the influence of the ATA on John and of the Wraith on John is a way of making John's body a queer body.

I still feel like the monstrous queer is equally a "straight" reading of the show, as monanotlisa puts it below -- but I'm not trying to say that it's the overwhelming structure that subsumes all of these other queer readings.

Reply


green_grrl October 31 2007, 06:11:41 UTC
(following cathexys's link) Awesome! I look forward to your PhD defense.

What, you mean this isn't your thesis?

*loves like whoa*

Reply

eruthros November 1 2007, 04:25:28 UTC
Ha! I only wish -- then I'd be done :)

Also, I wouldn't have to call watching SGA "procrastinating." And "being lazy."

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

eruthros October 31 2007, 12:18:43 UTC
I'm running off to work, so more response later but:

I love the "omg subversion of cliches" + the closeted heterosexuality SO MUCH.

And ... it amuses the pants off of me that fandom is so attuned to these things that we immediately go "is that your sidearm heh heh?" Like I said: fans know what guns mean!

Reply


copracat October 31 2007, 11:44:03 UTC
It certainly allows a brain to hold the two thoughts "John is queer" and "John and Larrin kissing was hot" without falling over.

Reply

eruthros October 31 2007, 12:16:37 UTC
I like those two thoughts :) Oh, John!

Also, it lets me call this a "big queer show."

Reply


galaxy_song October 31 2007, 12:03:20 UTC
huh well I would never of thought of this not ever ever but it makes a lot of sense in a brain melting way. Just going to take a while to let all sink in but I really like your way of thinking its like you are not only thinking out side the box, the box no longer exists hhhhmmmm

Reply

eruthros November 4 2007, 00:39:25 UTC
I'm glad it makes sense!

And yeah, I like a world without boxes :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up