Good luck, and by the way, of course Victoria's Secret is not competition for these other fine books. But if the catalogue ever points out which one of those women is Victoria and we find out what her secret is, we may have new required reading in English.
Definately. Victoria's Secret is better than Jack London any day of the week.
Then again, I hate Jack London and I think nearly everyone is better than Jack London (except the despicable William Golding).
But I think if anyone knew Victoria's Secret, it would not be required reading but banned from all schools. It can't be appropriate, whatever it is.
And who said Victoria was one of the models? She could be, uh a really old lady who wishes that she wasn't so ugly and figures if she wears nice enough underwear, she might feel sexy. Or maybe it's a man under an alias with an underwear fetish.
Didn't Edith Wharton write The Age of Innocence? I should know that, but I don't.
You are incredibly astute. I think you should write the store a letter demanding to know why they only display women as models and no men with underwear fetishes. I'd sign a petition.
I should. Men with underwear fetishes are common enough and besides, if women are to be in minimal amounts of clothes and objectified then men should be too.
Comments 10
Reply
Reply
Reply
Then again, I hate Jack London and I think nearly everyone is better than Jack London (except the despicable William Golding).
But I think if anyone knew Victoria's Secret, it would not be required reading but banned from all schools. It can't be appropriate, whatever it is.
And who said Victoria was one of the models? She could be, uh a really old lady who wishes that she wasn't so ugly and figures if she wears nice enough underwear, she might feel sexy. Or maybe it's a man under an alias with an underwear fetish.
Didn't Edith Wharton write The Age of Innocence? I should know that, but I don't.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment