plural,
here posted how he feels about the whole women taking their husbands' last names at marriage thing. And then a whole bunch of people commented (and still are commenting probably). Instead of commenting there, I'm going to think in writing here. And I'm going to make a poll, and request comments from you
(
Read more... )
Comments 22
- Bill
Reply
Reply
Ben Hsia!!
- Bill
Reply
Reply
but Im married and I have the EXACT stance on it as you. Ive gotten heat from my feminist friends about changing my name, but basically....i took my husbands last name because it was about a million times better than my maiden name, which i loathed and hate my father who gave it to me as well...soooOOO, yeah.
maiden name: Lindze Duininck
Married name: Lindze Merritt (much better, right?)
BUT if i had liked my maiden name, i would have kept it. i didnt change it to be tradtional, or so things would make more sense to people, but just cause i wanted to. Im not into keeping original names just to be a feminist...i think its an individual choice on how you feel about it fitting YOU.
but personally, i think the guys should have to change their names. following a matriarchal family line is more logical than patriarchal, just since its more acurate. no bra burning in that statement...just logic.
Reply
and, certainly, i like what you said :)
regarding the matriarchal family line, i never really thought about it before, but now i will happily be considering it for awhile. it particularly makes sense when keeping in mind that jewish lineage is passed on through the mother.
A recent response in plural's journal is from a woman who kept her name just because that's her, and their children have *her* last name (because they feel children should have the same last name as their mother). Which I agree with... and I find it strange that I so readily agree because the only examples I've ever seen of parents w/ diff. names have children who have their father's name.
It's actually cool cause as the comments in plural's journal progress, they're less and less responses to what he wrote, and more statements that are similar to our viewpoint... It's a name, it's names, and it's what suits us.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
as far as the "ownership" issue, it may be a small battle, but i honestly can't think of a better way to remove the idea of transferring ownership of the woman from one family to the other than to get rid of that name convention, and, well, i, speaking as a male of course, certainly see this as an important women's issue
not only that, but i like your last name and would hate for you to give it up.
Reply
you're making me laugh. a lot :)
actually, it occured to me eventually that it's possible women have taken their husbands' names for so long because the children so identify with their mothers. it's almost unfair... as Lindze (above) said, it makes sense to go matriarchal, and it makes sense (i think) that children should have the same name as their mother... ha, now i know for certain i need to think about this.
i think it would be hilarious if we literally flipped a coin for each child (me, bearing children? whoa...).
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment