Sexy 'swingers clubs' okay, Supreme Court rules*
Poll "Swingers" clubs I'm making this post public so please feel free to link to it in your journal or anywhere else. I'm assuming people commenting will converse as adults. Please don't prove me wrong. :P
I'd prefer people voted before reading (
my opinion )
Comments 10
Its a grey interpretation that is at the core of this. Is paying admission/membership fees for a club in which sex acts happen the same as paying for sex?
I don't believe so. These club owners or event organizers have costs. You cover their costs. Its a party. Ever walk into a room at a party to find someone going at it? If you paid a cover for the party, would you have been participating in prostitution? No.
Reply
But in their ruling Wednesday, the Supreme Court judges said the test for indecency should not simply be whether an activity violates a "social consensus" of community standards, but the actual harm it causes.
I see no harm in consenting adults bumping uglies with as many other adults that consent to join and or watch said uglies bumping.
Reply
I'm starting to wonder if Canada is a more politically favorable climate for the likes of me...
Reply
Reply
What consenting adults do in private is their own business. The public should have some say in what they can do in public. :)
Reply
Reply
Anyway, no shock that I'm very open-minded about things.. :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment