Comments | exiledfromeden: Yay math modeling

exiledfromeden

Yay math modeling

Oct 18, 2006 12:25

I found this ealier

( Read more... )

Comments 10

charliemarauder October 18 2006, 19:03:49 UTC

[points]
NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

Actually, that's kinda cool, and I'm a nerd, too.

Still,
NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

zurell October 18 2006, 19:30:01 UTC

*snickers* You even pulled a flow chart. ^^ I'm so amused.

verymlle October 18 2006, 20:24:22 UTC

I feel nerdy just by association and the fact that I understand your equations. and the graph isn't quite right... among other things, it's assuming your chances of getting laid without knowing any john mayer songs is 50% (*scoff* ;)) and the equation shouldn't apply below a range of x=0 (it's doing some funky shit over there in the second quadrant)

If you only put this much effort into your REAL school work...

exiledfromeden October 18 2006, 21:02:45 UTC

You're right about the fact that it shouldn't extend to the second quadrent. However you didnt read the part about Di...Di is not assumed to be one, Di is some number that represents your initial 'layability' (so to speak) without knowing any john mayer songs.

verymlle October 19 2006, 04:11:08 UTC

yes, but i was commenting on the graph and reading the y-intercept at .50 = 50%... am i wrong?

exiledfromeden October 19 2006, 04:52:51 UTC

That's because the graph couldn't be parametrized to run on two variables, the Di was just set at an arbitrary number (1), which shows the inherent flaw, is that Di is not the Di i have stated but Di = D' when P=0 and Di is some number

wildeshinigami October 18 2006, 21:49:31 UTC

wow.
i'm not saying that you're a geek or anything, but....
but i can't think of a way to finish that sentence. ^.~

cuddlepenguin October 19 2006, 01:12:11 UTC

please tell me you didn't spend more than 10 minutes on all that....