I've always thought it made no sense how people talk down to the disabled, as if one part of them not working means that all of the parts (especially the brain... I guess?) aren't working. But reading this kind of explains it a little--as much as we want to, humans aren't very good at minutiae.
That also explains the debate about social services in the U.S. right now.
No, humans aren't very good at what I can only describe as mental and emotional fine motor skills. Thanks for taking the time to read and engage with this.
I like this piece a great deal. As someone who has been involved in this dual-role situation more than once, it resonates with me much. I really like your writing and hope I get to see a lot more.
Thank you. It occurred to me that what you described in your entry is a prime example of a helper seeing a prospective helper as someone who only belongs to the helped.
I liked the thoughtfulness of this, and the exploration of the tendency to make a dichotomy between these two roles... that can actually coexist in the same person, even at the same time. Your husband's situation was proof of it-- why can't he be emotionally supportive while physically recovering?
This also nicely questions what we value as 'important' in social contribution. How can reaching things from a high shelf compare to what a loving friendship provides?
Nodding...Society seems to value most of all people who can *do* things in measurable ways. Thanks for reading, engaging, and taking the time to leave feedback.
I think it's generally best for help to be reciprocal -- maybe not with the same people all the time, but certainly it's not good to push someone into one role over the other.
I agree that help isn't going to be an equal give and take with all people at all times. There are times when it shouldn't be, such as in a therapist/client situation.
Thanks for reading and taking the time to respond.
Comments 26
Reply
Reply
That also explains the debate about social services in the U.S. right now.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
This also nicely questions what we value as 'important' in social contribution. How can reaching things from a high shelf compare to what a loving friendship provides?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Thanks for reading and taking the time to respond.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment