Encyclopaedia Britannica falls for Discovery Institute Propaganda (repost from Waffle)

[farmercuerden]

From http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9432671/intelligent-design

I cannot believe this. It ignores all the criticism deservedly heaped upon Intelligent Design. It ignores Kitzmiller, it parrots all their claims uncritically. Perhaps the full version

Comments

[antiquated_tory]

They would have saved a lot of time and trouble if they'd edited the entry down to 'See creationism.'

Idetrorce

[anonymous]

very interesting, but I don't agree with you
Idetrorce

Wikipedia user?

[anonymous]

Hi, if you are the same Adam Cuerden that occasionally edited WikiPedia, I just thought I'd drop a note to say how sorry I am to see you have "vanished". I hope this is not the end of your excellent contributions to the 'pedia - another lost soul to the frustratins of beaurocracy!

Wikipedia user?

[anonymous]

Hi, if you are the same Adam Cuerden that occasionally edited WikiPedia, I just thought I'd drop a note to say how sorry I am to see you have "vanished". I hope this is not the end of your excellent contributions to the 'pedia - another lost soul to the frustrations of bureaucracy!