Comments | fatherdog: No Animals Were Harmed In The Creation Of This Post

fatherdog

No Animals Were Harmed In The Creation Of This Post

Jan 24, 2007 14:29

The fact that chocolate is lethal to dogs is surely evidence in favor of a cruel and malevolent god.

Comments 12

rejoicingapathy January 24 2007, 19:41:28 UTC

I doubt the claims of chocolate toxicity only because my stupid golden retriever has eaten my entire bag of halloween candy with no notable ill side effects (such as death). Also baskets of easter candy and other such chocolatey goodies.

Someone once told me that they had to eat their weight in chocolate, and seriously, if I ate 150 pounds of chocolate, I would die too.

fatherdog January 24 2007, 19:45:38 UTC

Your dog is too dumb to die!

I don't know if I could eat 190 lbs of chocolate, but it seems like a valiant effort could be expended.

rejoicingapathy January 24 2007, 19:54:39 UTC

You buy the chocolate, and we can have a death-by-chocolate suicide pact in the interests of SCIENCE!

fatherdog January 25 2007, 01:46:21 UTC

I used to eat cans of chocolate frosting as gaming snacks; I think I shall outlast you.

Thread 7

amhorach January 24 2007, 22:34:09 UTC

On the other hand, many dogs eat poop, so maybe it is evidence of a god with a discriminating pallate.

lovelycharlotte January 25 2007, 00:35:40 UTC

chocolate is so good. especially extra dark.

fatherdog January 25 2007, 01:47:40 UTC

While the inability of dogs to enjoy chocolate may demonstrate that god does not love us, the existence of dutch chocolate vodka ensures that we know that at least the brewing industry does.

lovelycharlotte January 26 2007, 02:55:29 UTC

of course they love us, we pay them a lot of money to.

and i mean a lot.

and now for something completely different cosmic_hiccup January 25 2007, 00:38:06 UTC

Sorry you were swamped today...I'll try again next time I'm in town.