On Institutional Culpability for Nine-Eleven

May 31, 2007 22:35

I promised mojave_wolf a post about the destruction of the World Trade Center and the explanations of it, to spare ataxi from hosting a discussion of it on an unrelated post of his.

And this cut spares you, the reader, from having it on your friends page! )

Leave a comment

Comments 1

mojave_wolf June 10 2007, 12:02:10 UTC
Hey. I only just saw this. I kept remembering that I wanted to check your journal when I was nowhere near a computer. And now 'tis middle of night -- no, almost dawn -- and I'm about to go to bed. Quickie response --

n other words, nobody that I have heard has presented a coherent, over-arching theory of how 9/11 "really" happened, complete with facts and citations to back it up, standing up to scrutiny and criticism (and in fact I recently heard David Ray Griffin pooh-pooh this very idea, stating explicitly that the conspiracy theorists have a different, lesser burden of proof than the defenders of the "official theory").Well, I have seen several different ones, but there really is no way to know exactly what went down w/out facts unlikely ever to appear. My primary reasoning for thinking they deliberately let it happen is that various people in various agencies knew more or less where the principles were and all warnings were not only shoved aside, but in some cases those who tried to warn overly persistently were slapped ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up