Well, well, well.... seems like 52% of the stupid f***ing sheep voters in California have proven that we too still deserve the title of "Bigot State"-- likewise too many of these morons voters seem to have no comprehension of the idea of SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE since their expressed opinion in voting on Proposition 8 (State Constitutional
(
Read more... )
Comments 3
[chortle]
I was just "talking" to another LJ friend who is (rightly, imo) upset that Arkansas wants to make it illegal for non-married people to adopt children. She believes this is merely an attempt to get "marriage defense" with language that will pass constitutional review.
I think she is correct. However, I hope their chosen petard is comfy. The language seeks to bar *any* non-married couple from adopting. I bet that somewhere in Arkansas, a group is working carefully to find the perfect heterosexual, cohabiting couple to star in a legal challenge. (In the day of the "Boston marriage," they might have found the perfect same-sex heterosexual couple. Hmmm. I wonder how hard that would be ..)
My LJfriend "blaurentv" has another
Reply
I am heterosexual and married to a spouse of the opposite gender, and this most definitely affects me personally. Just one of the ways : one of the many rationalizations for "marriage defense" is that marriage is specifically for procreation.
Yeah, I know. Procreation hardly relies on marriage. Birds do it. Bees do it. etc.
But, at some point, someone is going to put this into legal language which will seek to make my childless marriage invalid.
I posted other reasons why this affects me personally (and, I think, all of us) in my journal. Take a peek. 11/4 "Because I promised ..."
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment