Comments | firebrand_faux: Fluff for the viewing

firebrand_faux

Fluff for the viewing

Feb 17, 2007 12:59

I just realised that I've not showcased our new arrivals yet. Shame on me and my non-sharing of the fluffy kittenses ( Read more... )

Comments 16

lilifer February 17 2007, 15:51:24 UTC

They are SO adorable...

Makes me very angry when people neglect their cats.. seriously, it makes me violent!

firebrand_faux February 17 2007, 21:08:57 UTC

If I found them, I'd break their legs and leave them 'Misery' stylee.

(The comment has been removed)

firebrand_faux February 17 2007, 21:08:23 UTC

Ummm.... what?

pleb February 18 2007, 03:39:26 UTC

I think we just lost contact with our Moon-unit.

firebrand_faux February 18 2007, 09:29:42 UTC

I think you may be right :-/

cydergoth February 17 2007, 21:02:18 UTC

Given that they are identichipped which is normally a sign of responsible ownership, have you considered that the problems may result from a previous owner rather than the one who chipped them?

firebrand_faux February 17 2007, 21:08:01 UTC

Then why were they shut out of the flats for a month and having to be fed by the people on the ground floor?

cydergoth February 17 2007, 22:20:49 UTC

Do you know that for sure? Maybe someone died? Cats are notorious for scamming food of other people too.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by
stupidity." - Robert J Hanlon/Robert Heinlein

There are bad pet owners in this world, but there should be sufficient
evidence of that fact before jumping to what _may_ be invalid
conclusions.

Not to say that there isn't that evidence, but you should be able to
get their chips checked without returning them to the owners if you do
have it. I'm sure the RSPCA would do this.

firebrand_faux February 17 2007, 22:31:04 UTC

I'd put all my trust in Christine to have made the right decision. She has up to 100 abandoned or unwanted cats up for rehoming at any one time.

She can scan the chips herself. She got a mobile no. but it was unobtainable.

anonymous February 18 2007, 01:06:39 UTC

I wouldn't put any trust in Christine.

She's a car, that does stuff...;)

x

firebrand_faux February 18 2007, 09:29:04 UTC

Actually, that's a pretty good description of the woman if you make that 'a car FOR TRANSPORTING NUMEROUS MOGS that does LOTS of stuff'

;)

anonymous February 18 2007, 04:16:02 UTC

Poor babies! People who hurt animals suck and should be burned at the stake.

BTW, you know about the two "Year Zero" "leaks," right?

s.

firebrand_faux February 18 2007, 09:27:37 UTC

Actually, no! But now I do ;)

anonymous February 19 2007, 00:15:16 UTC

Excellent! There's a forum on ETS where all the info about the Year Zero ARG is collected. I'd avoid any threads but the one titled "Current Summary of Year Zero." There are about 5,000 new members who are positively the most obnoxious forum rats ever and they clog up the good info with silly speculation. But it's a very cool concept Mr. McRezmo has developed and watching it unfold is really intriguing.

s.

firebrand_faux February 19 2007, 00:24:16 UTC

Nice :) I shall have to have a little trawl through ;)

Thread 5