N.S., the victim witness in a trial against two men accused of sexual assault, wishes to wear a niqab in court while testifying against the defendants. This has gone to the Supreme Court, who has basically put it back to the trial judge, stating that these issues must be decided on a case-by-case basis, using the following four criteria:
a) the
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
Reply
Eh. That's what they're saying, but it frankly makes no sense. It's as much to her benefit - probably more so - that the jury be able to see her face. Why would the defense assume that the jury being able to see her expression - likely her agitation, possibly her tears - would be beneficial to THEM? Who knows, maybe she'd come across poorly and it would help the defense, but I think it's much more likely that it would not. A witness with a covered face (in Western society) seems more sketchy to a factfinder, apart from any potential religious bias.
I didn't know that people could cover their faces in court in the US. I can see the problem with it in court. I don't think it's a problem. In many cases the jury does not have the very best evidence, or all the evidence, for all kinds of reasons, and we don't have a heart attack. Also, wouldn't forcing a person to remove a niqab against her will mislead the jury or cause ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment