I'd hesitate before using the word "Evil". Evil sort of implies that they know that it's a terrible idea that is probably going to hurt thousands of people. I can almost guarantee that that's not the way that they're thinking about it. Don't get me wrong, they're a buch of bad guys, but I doubt they sit around in a room thinking "How can we make sure that more rape victims will end up having children?" "How can we change the education system so that we get more teenage preganancies?". I think that they're just awful people to have in charge, not that they're actively out to get us, but rather that they aren't sufficiently helping us
( ... )
Mao wanted to create a society in which everyone was equal and peasants weren't exploited by their landlords.
I believe he still committed evil acts in ignorance. I don't know about you, but even in ignorance ruining thousands of lives is evil.
And, perhaps, being that most men aren't forced to have sex, but try to "spread the seed", not to mention that it isn't near as physically intrusive to a man and that no man can even begin to understand the long term psycological effects and hundreds of thousands of dollars often spent on therapy, let alone a child, a male may not entirely understand how entirely evil it is to: a) not test thousands of rape kits, b) force women to be cross-examined in court, c) make it difficult in any way for women to either prosecute their attacker or deal with the issue, d) make thousands of women feel like it's not rape if it isn't violent or it's their fault ... which people do all the time, whether you knew it or not
The way that the united states, and the world at large, deals with rapes is simply atrocious. I would argue that it is better than it has been, but society at large still has a lot of serious problems. There are legal issues also, but as you say the problem is primarily the way that most people view it
( ... )
The issue of rape is not better than it was years ago because rape is even more common and more widespread than it was years ago, which is certainly saying something. There is a huge difference between an evil act and an evil person. You certainly didn't read what I wrote very thoroughly. Next time listen before you go off on one of your speils. Sometimes I think you like to hear yourself talk, far too much, and don't do enough listening. And of course, since you are God, who you consider deserves to die should be our definition of evil. Isn't that right? Besides just to through your words back at you, for your information, Mao was a polititian who made a series of bad policy choices ... well ... for the most part ... of course he also did kill people who spoke out against him, but I think that even without that aspect and just taking into consideration how he made millions of Chinese starve to death and all sorts of attrocities because he was an absolute moron, many people would call him (or his policies) evil.
Comments 10
Reply
I believe he still committed evil acts in ignorance. I don't know about you, but even in ignorance ruining thousands of lives is evil.
And, perhaps, being that most men aren't forced to have sex, but try to "spread the seed", not to mention that it isn't near as physically intrusive to a man and that no man can even begin to understand the long term psycological effects and hundreds of thousands of dollars often spent on therapy, let alone a child, a male may not entirely understand how entirely evil it is to: a) not test thousands of rape kits, b) force women to be cross-examined in court, c) make it difficult in any way for women to either prosecute their attacker or deal with the issue, d) make thousands of women feel like it's not rape if it isn't violent or it's their fault ... which people do all the time, whether you knew it or not
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment