I think it's more about "no pork left behind." Clinton was a man. He had backbone. He was a great president. Clinton would actually veto terrible spending bills. And you know what? He turned deficits into surpluses. Hell, he even made good use of the line item veto before the supreme court took it away.
Bush, on the other hand? Crap, there's not enough bad things to say about him or his blind supporters. Spending has increased, and a lot of it is on pork. Why would Bush veto anything that helps the special interest groups that love him so much?
Comments 2
Bush, on the other hand? Crap, there's not enough bad things to say about him or his blind supporters. Spending has increased, and a lot of it is on pork. Why would Bush veto anything that helps the special interest groups that love him so much?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment