I agree that we have a very lossy voting system. Thanks for putting up this analysis. The one wording change I would use is "discarded" - 70% of votes were discarded once the results were known.
(The discarded votes carry a bit of information to the electorate and the parties for next time round, so they are a tiny bit not pointless.)
Thanks - I will keep it updated as more results are released.
I think I disagree about writing 'discarded' votes, but this may be a wording issue. It imples, to me, that had they not been discarded, there could have been a difference. But that is not so - all you need is 1 more than the next person and the rest is truly irrelevant/pointless from then on.
Of course an interesting point to investigate would be to work out had we had PR, would *more* people have voted and the current split would be still the same?
So clearly we need something better. Any ideas? I hear tell some countries have a lower threshold for a seat with PR which helps keeps some of the more dangerous parties out.
Comments 16
(The discarded votes carry a bit of information to the electorate and the parties for next time round, so they are a tiny bit not pointless.)
Reply
I think I disagree about writing 'discarded' votes, but this may be a wording issue. It imples, to me, that had they not been discarded, there could have been a difference. But that is not so - all you need is 1 more than the next person and the rest is truly irrelevant/pointless from then on.
Of course an interesting point to investigate would be to work out had we had PR, would *more* people have voted and the current split would be still the same?
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment