To all those lamenting the hobby lobby case. 16 of 20 forms of "contraception" are currently covered by hobby lobby. 4 types of "contraception" are excluded. Including "plan B", and other "post event" "contraception". The decision specifically applies to closely held family businesses. It's not an expansion of "corporate personhood", because it is
(
Read more... )
Comments 20
Agreed. We shouldn't need a Supreme Court ruling to tell us the sky is blue.
Reply
Reply
If it stays with '4 of 16 types of contraception are unavailable' then that's not a major disaster. Forcing people to choose between any birth control at all and better healthcare for their current family (i.e. between an exchange plan that's almost certainly less value for money, but covers birth control, and the employer plan) is rather more of a problem.
Especially because birth control isn't just birth control - I take the Pill primarily because it stops me being incapacitated with pain and depression from my hormones and period for a week or more out of every month.
Reply
And that they are not expensive?
And that insurance that prohibits them are contraception can cover the same drugs if used for other reasons, just as a formulary can allow a drug selectively for different purposes?
Reply
And how inexpensive are we talking? I get the impression that the people who are affected by this are low-wage retail workers who aren't known for having much spare money lying around.
(In my country you can't purchase most forms of contraception with money - they're available free on the NHS but you need to get a health check to make sure you're not particularly susceptible to the side effects of one variety and therefore should pick another...)
Reply
$9 a month.
One notes that low-wage retail workers aren't usually affected by this because they don't have insurance.
Reply
I've had neither time nor mental energy to be involved in this particular Controversy of the Day.
But your above comment seems to be the usual when it comes to any issue! There's XYZ Controversy, then there's the XYZ legal ruling or response from the involved parties, then follows the backlash, then the backlash to the backlash, and then the backlash to the backlash of... the backlash.
And more often than not, when you go aaaaaaaaaaaaall the way back to the original issue, you see how everything has been misrepresented and/or the actual points lost in all the shrieking back and forth.
I'm sick of it.
Can anyone READ or LISTEN these days?
Reply
Which is why I am bleeding a vein to pay for private school. :,
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
>.>
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment