"climate change" thought experiment

May 26, 2017 23:11

Okay, so this is just a thought experiment to demonstrate the futility of fighting "climate change ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 35

banner May 27 2017, 06:42:38 UTC
I think the numbers for China are way too low. Considering how much pollution they generate, I suspect their carbon emissions are way higher than that of the US.

Reply

coercedbynutmeg May 27 2017, 12:44:15 UTC
Agreed. Killing off everyone on the whole damned continent of Asia would do a lot to improve things, though the necessary shifting of manufacturing back to the non-Asia parts of the world would cause their carbon emissions to increase.

Honestly, the EU and the US can do everything they want to cut carbon emissions or save the Ozone Layer but unless they get China, India, and Pakistan completely on board (and they certainly won't), they'll get nowhere. In my neighboring compound, there's a carport with 40 or 50 bottles of R-22 stacked like cordwood, and R-22 is illegal in the EU and being phased out in North America. Here, though, they put it in AC units that burn through it like gasoline.

Reply

ford_prefect42 May 27 2017, 13:22:43 UTC
Well, 2 things there, 1) i show china emitting twice us emissions, and 2) pollution generally doesn't really signify on co2, pollution is usually due to bad practices, where co2 is straight energy consumption×fuel mix.

So, i suspect that the number is close enough.

Reply

banner May 27 2017, 16:54:40 UTC
China burns coal for power. That generates a lot of carbon
China also has billions of people. That also generates a lot of carbon. (and I bet they didn't figure the people into the numbers).

Reply


allaboutweather May 27 2017, 12:40:11 UTC
Marxists never had a problem killing millions of people. To them, "the ends justify the means". :/

Reply

ford_prefect42 May 27 2017, 17:24:00 UTC
I am, at this point, a little uncertain whether the killing is an "end" in itself, or if it's just a "means" for them.

Reply

allaboutweather May 27 2017, 20:13:24 UTC
I think it's more of a "means".

Reply

allaboutweather May 27 2017, 20:33:36 UTC
Given how many times i have heard them complain about "overpopulation ", i have my doubts.

Reply


prester_scott May 27 2017, 12:40:36 UTC
That is, in fact, what some Greens want: to exterminate a vast majority of the human race -- not including themselves, of course -- ostensibly to purify the planet.

Reply

“our odious rat-like species” baron_waste May 28 2017, 16:22:04 UTC
Re: “our odious rat-like species” prester_scott May 28 2017, 17:12:55 UTC
LOL.

Reply


marycatelli May 27 2017, 13:06:21 UTC
Well, duh. What you do is use nukes. That will kill 'em, AND produce a nuclear winter.

Meanwhile plants will . . . whoops, plants will also suffer under a nuclear winter and not drag down as much carbon. Needs some refinement.

Reply

banner May 27 2017, 16:55:12 UTC
Neutron bombs! :-)

Reply

Send in the Triffids baron_waste May 28 2017, 05:20:37 UTC


Genengineer carnivorous plants!  Easy peasy.

Next!

Reply


livejournal May 27 2017, 13:28:15 UTC
Hello! Your entry got to top-25 of the most popular entries in LiveJournal!
Learn more about LiveJournal Ratings in FAQ.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up