Sex, lies, and more lies.

Sep 23, 2007 22:42

...apparently, there is no gag order.

(If you don't know what this is about, count yourself lucky)

Leave a comment

Comments 16

alphaggek September 24 2007, 03:49:18 UTC
Joy....

Reply


herveus September 24 2007, 10:59:15 UTC
Gee. I wonder who was spreading the rumor that there was one, and what their agenda were? I don't know enough to make a sane assessment of the situation, but it's not pretty, no matter how you slice it.

Reply

fosveny September 24 2007, 12:15:54 UTC
Hanlon's Razor

Reply

bunnyjadwiga September 24 2007, 18:30:23 UTC
Hm.. Dunno, but I suspect it was a misunderstanding and probably a desire to protect the victim.

Reply

bunnyjadwiga September 24 2007, 18:34:29 UTC
Oh, I did hear this rumor, btw, with the protecting the victim codicil and passed that to someone who posted an 'oh wow, I never liked this person' post--which may be the one fosveny is referring to. I hope not.

Reply


suba_al_hadid September 24 2007, 12:48:50 UTC
I guess I'm one of the 'lucky' ones, since I have no idea what you mean. Nonetheless, since you're caught in whatever-it-is, I send hugs your way.

Reply

fosveny September 24 2007, 15:04:17 UTC
Not caught in it. Just a horrified bystander.

Reply

suba_al_hadid September 25 2007, 19:11:31 UTC
Good that you're not caught in it. Whatever it is must be incredible.

Reply


h3salthea September 24 2007, 13:07:04 UTC
Huzzah for having no idea what this is about and not wanting any details either!

Looking forward to seeing-you-in-passing at Coronation?

Reply

fosveny September 24 2007, 15:04:38 UTC
I will be there, yes. See you there!

Reply

aliwodehalle September 24 2007, 20:01:09 UTC
Agree with h3salthea, though I think I might know what this is (not certain) not wanting any details, and looking forward to seeing you at Coronation!

Reply


ladypeyton September 24 2007, 14:55:44 UTC
Huh. Does that mean it's OK to tell people who ask or should it still be kept quiet for the good of the group? I'm torn.

Reply

fosveny September 24 2007, 15:14:05 UTC
My reason for posting:

At least one person posted a long discussion on this site about the issues that surround the case in question, and removed (locked?) that post when told there was a gag order.

That was a misunderstanding of how gag orders work -- if you are not a named party in the gag order (and you would know if you were), the order does not apply to you.

Nor does it apply to things which are a matter of public record. Like, say, arrests.

Whether or not it's OK to tell people depends on your own conscience.

I am personally a *BIG* fan of NOT keeping things quiet. I think that secrecy begets tyranny. It also makes people think that there must be a reason that it was being hushed up.

I do tend to limit my public discourse to verifiable facts. "X is accused of Y. There was an arrest. X is free on (bail/recognizance)." type statements.

YMMV, but this works for me.

Reply

ladypeyton September 24 2007, 15:19:07 UTC
I am personally a *BIG* fan of NOT keeping things quiet. I think that secrecy begets tyranny. It also makes people think that there must be a reason that it was being hushed up.

I tend to agree. Especially since there have been follow up actions takena and most people have no idea why.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up