The Art of Photography

[froozzt]

 So what's wrong with Film, I ask?

1) Film takes too long to process
2) Film takes too long to print
3) Film's too troublesome to change from roll to roll
4) There are only 36 exposures in a roll
5) Film's so much more expensive in the long run
6) Film's so inaccurate and it's just a shot in the dark

Very true. But what if film photography was the true

Comments

[binli_ng]

i think people used to treasure photos more in the past when we had to use film. cause u carn see the outcome immediately but you have to bet on the shot that nothing screws up and you know every shot made is gonna cost you money so everything is taken with care, love and considerations. seems like we tend to overshoot with digital photography and people dun treasure the photos as much because of the humongous number of photos we take. but yup as you mentioned, film and digital have their pros and cons.

[septsuicide]

great entry, i have a lot to say about this, but the bottomline is that, it all depends on the photographer : )
i've added this to my memories,hope you don't mind.

[froozzt]

haha go on add it :)

glad you read it, heh. and yes, very true. it all depends on the photographer :) anyway, i will be posting up a set of re-processed photos in a few minutes. do check it out!