I find it intersting that this article uses some subtly different language that significantly changes "audience perception" of the situation. For example, in this article it mentions the students being asked to comment on Alex's *behavior*, whereas the original article mentions students being asked to comment on *Alex himself.*
Not necessarily saying that either is okay, or that kids that age should be expected to discern the difference, but the difference is an interesting one.
I noticed that also - and this isn't the first difference of its kind I've noticed in the coverage of this case (I've now read about a dozen articles on it). I'd love to know exactly what happened, because no two news sources seem to agree. I'd also love to know what the sources are for each version.
I'd also love to have more information about the school and its teachers, administratiors, and special ed case managers, counselors, and teachers.
Comments 5
I find it intersting that this article uses some subtly different language that significantly changes "audience perception" of the situation. For example, in this article it mentions the students being asked to comment on Alex's *behavior*, whereas the original article mentions students being asked to comment on *Alex himself.*
Not necessarily saying that either is okay, or that kids that age should be expected to discern the difference, but the difference is an interesting one.
Reply
I'd also love to have more information about the school and its teachers, administratiors, and special ed case managers, counselors, and teachers.
Reply
All the news sources (i think) have been coming from the same Florida newspaper's online edition.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment