usage note

Aug 18, 2010 15:47

Someone this year, a GOOD editor, someone I respect!, was puzzled by a usage like the following:

In her 1955 novel, The Long Tomorrow, Brackett writes...

To be able to refer to a novel published in 1955 as a 1955 novel has always struck me as simple, elegant, useful.  I do it a lot!  Is it not okay?  I thought it was common!

It did occur to me that it ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

kaputnick August 18 2010, 21:24:36 UTC
I do that a lot too! I never thought there was anything wrong with it. I've done it regularly for novels, films, and scientific studies. No one has ever questioned it.

Reply

galorette August 18 2010, 21:26:29 UTC
Right!
Does it come to us via science, then? Because, you're right, "A 2002 paper" is also totally common and normal!

Reply

kaputnick August 18 2010, 21:29:13 UTC
Hmmmm, I suppose I could have picked it up from science but I've never had anyone question it in the humanities either. I'm confused as to why it would be incorrect to begin with.

Reply

galorette August 18 2010, 21:36:14 UTC
Man, I should have asked why it was "wrong" because now it will bug me forever!

Reply


yoda4554 August 18 2010, 22:36:36 UTC
That's a pretty common usage. (Frankly, the equine usage seems way weirder.) Wonder what's confusing...

Reply


ppaladin August 18 2010, 22:56:48 UTC
I think it is common usage also

Reply


Leave a comment

Up