I definitely prefer the second one; can't exactly explain why off the top of my head but, the concept and characters seem interesting and I like the idea behind it. Especially if you do a separate little book for each character detailing up to a point where they all meet/both meet each other. (I wanna see how she's "torn apart" by the knight seven times as well. Is it literal? Emotional? Figurative? So much potential!)
I do like to tell multiple stories at once. If I don't make separate stories for everyone, I'll make small additional chapters that expand upon the character. That is why I named my book "FRAGMENTS". I want to tell a story that is like numerous little pieces that make up a really beautiful whole.
The meaning behind "torn apart" is multi-faceted, but I think you'll like it if you like xxxHolic or Tsubasa. It's a bit like those two series, and it's different every time.
Yeah, the second one was much easier to write. I don't know, I think it's because my mindset changed so much over the years.
The first one is the original concept and it's completely scribbled down in terms of event progression. The second one is a sequel to the original concept that emerged in my head as my mind changed shape. I like the second one more, but I feel a little bit guilty about letting the first one go to waste.
Maybe if I eventually reused most drafts for the first one in the second one..?
I've been thinking about something like that. Because one narrative is a continuation of the other, I could include certain events as flashbacks or coincidences in order to link them better.
The thing is that I like some scenes in the first narrative, but I don't want to write the whole thing because of how clunky it is. XD;
Comments 14
Reply
I'm trying to decide which one to write. I have the entire first premise planned out, but I like the second one much more.
Reply
My vote is definitely for the second one. ^_^
Reply
The meaning behind "torn apart" is multi-faceted, but I think you'll like it if you like xxxHolic or Tsubasa. It's a bit like those two series, and it's different every time.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The first one is the original concept and it's completely scribbled down in terms of event progression. The second one is a sequel to the original concept that emerged in my head as my mind changed shape. I like the second one more, but I feel a little bit guilty about letting the first one go to waste.
Maybe if I eventually reused most drafts for the first one in the second one..?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The thing is that I like some scenes in the first narrative, but I don't want to write the whole thing because of how clunky it is. XD;
Reply
But both are very beautiful. <3
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
WHAT D8
Reply
It seems like it just moves better, more natural.. idk. It just seems like it makes you want more.
Reply
Leave a comment