Leave a comment

Comments 11

jonnycowbells February 26 2008, 15:43:36 UTC
It makes me feel better about my usual advice of "Get a grip and buy some new clothes or something."

Most of us need crutches for mental health, it's just that some seem to be endorsed by doctors whilst others are made by Nintendo or sold by Top Shop.

*add flame here*

Reply


sciolist February 26 2008, 16:21:42 UTC
So... for severely depressed people, the drugs do have a greater beneficial effect than the placebo. Seems an unremarkable conclusion to draw.

Of course, I still favour the 'Eat better, get some fresh air and exercise' philosophy. If only there were regularly scheduled PT sessions on the NHS, you could prescribe them for depression -and- obesity!

Reply

gedhrel February 26 2008, 16:25:38 UTC
What irritates me is the reporting, which appears to say, "Prozac is so bad that it doesn't even work particularly for severely depressed people, it's just that the placebo has a reduced affect, so the conclusion that it's no good can be taken across the board."

Reply

jonnycowbells February 26 2008, 16:51:10 UTC
Reminds me of a certain report that went along the lines of "These children haven't got autism, but they've all had the MMR vaccine, so we'll stick them in that group anyway because they're bound to get it."

I'd hope it's ambiguous reporting because things like that can get one's licence to practise medicine taken away.

Reply

gedhrel February 26 2008, 20:51:01 UTC
Disappointingly, that particular phrasing occurs in the abstract too; presumably they were after the exposure that headlines can bring.

Reply


fox_uk February 26 2008, 16:43:00 UTC
Analysis, sir. Analysis!

I say this because I am still not sure I undertsand wtf he is talking about. Possibly that severely depressed patients do not react to a placebo at all, and so the actual effect of the drugs are measurably greater than that of a placebo effect in these patients only?

Reply

gedhrel February 26 2008, 16:47:34 UTC
Exactly, but to read it the way it's written you'd be forgiven for thinking that Prozac is uniformly ineffective.

Reply

fox_uk February 26 2008, 16:56:04 UTC
You mean the way they start the article with "Prozac...does not work and nor do similar drugs in the same class, according to a major review released today." Yeah, I can see how you could think that. ;)

Reply


keziath February 26 2008, 18:50:47 UTC
Grr.

I really, really hate reporting like this.

If they'd titled it "Prozac ineffective except in severe depression" or something similar I wouldn't have a problem with it (apart from the total failure to comprehend what a placebo is). As it is, please excuse me while I go and bang my head against a wall for a while...

Reply

gedhrel February 26 2008, 19:17:54 UTC
Time for a missive to the good Dr. Goldacre, I think.

Reply

alanwrotethis February 26 2008, 23:23:50 UTC
Grr!
If I'd written a psychology paper with a line like that in the conclusion or abstract I would:
a. do it to be drunk and ironic.
b. expect to switch course soon.
The tragedy is that the reports are interesting once you get over how monktarded the review of them is >.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up