The requirement for the bill to have gone through standard process was well evident in the complete lack of any understanding of the technological implications of this bill, :P
In addition to the points you mention above, I'm wondering about the reasonableness of this bill with regards to things like eg flatting situations where there is more than one internet user and/or people who are not necessarily the ISP bill payer using the internet.
Also what about dynamic IP adresses? Could users of these be accused of downloading something which in reality was downloaded by someone they have never even met?
Well written though, thanks!
(Found this post via the VOTE OUT NATIONAL group on FB, after it was posted there by a friend of a friend).
Comments 19
Well worded.
And sent.
I look forward to soon hearing the sound of their email inboxes exploding.
-AJC
Reply
Loren.Glover@parliament.govt.nz => Felicity.Cuzens@parliament.govt.nz
T.Turia@ministers.govt.nz => Missy.Winiata@parliament.govt.nz
Reply
Reply
Updated the paragraph regarding the dmca paper.
And yes, I've used an American spell checker, sorry. I'll try fix that now.
Reply
In addition to the points you mention above, I'm wondering about the reasonableness of this bill with regards to things like eg flatting situations where there is more than one internet user and/or people who are not necessarily the ISP bill payer using the internet.
Also what about dynamic IP adresses? Could users of these be accused of downloading something which in reality was downloaded by someone they have never even met?
Well written though, thanks!
(Found this post via the VOTE OUT NATIONAL group on FB, after it was posted there by a friend of a friend).
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment