(Untitled)

[general_seth]

Practicality of the matter advises non-intervention even though proceduralists will not concur with directions of events set into motion. Repetition of non-essential thought processes is not conducive to fulfilment of oath. Observation and post-action evaluation indicates a high possibility of negative affection to prior obligations

Comments

[xformysoulx]

What's all of this mean...? :o

[general_seth]

Discontentment.

[regal_lance]

((Private to Seth))

...It's been awhile since I've had this kind of reading. But let's see if I can piece together your puzzle.

"My mind tells me not to intervene even though I do not agree with how things are. These thoughts plague me, yet interfere with my oath. Based on what happened before, I can only expect ire if I were to do anything at all.

Sleep remains elusive."

Is this about who I think this is about, Seth?

[general_seth]

You have rephrased most of it correctly.

Perhaps so, King Ephraim.