Comments | georgeme89: (без темы)

georgeme89

(Untitled)

Jun 20, 2005 19:29

Did you know that Sir Issac Newtons theory of gravity is only true in low gravity situations. If you want a more true theory consult Einstien. When the big bang theory was being brought around some scientists believed that people who were proving this theory to be viable were doing it because they were religios and were looking for a plausible ( Read more... )

Comments 5

justfinethanku June 22 2005, 20:04:26 UTC

theological evolution is bull. I can prove it.

georgeme89 June 22 2005, 23:30:30 UTC

I dont think you can physically prove it. You may be able to using the bible but just saying you can prove it isnt too convincing.

just a quick example... justfinethanku June 23 2005, 15:05:18 UTC

Time = Amount / Rate ( ... )

georgeme89 June 23 2005, 22:19:40 UTC

That was a big copy and paste for you. I know your spelling isnt THAT consistent. Ok so basically your whole thing was about rodiometric dating. Is it so hard to believe that the observed half life of todays radioactive material is the same as it has always been? Thats uniformitarianism and it makes sense while there is still no evidence that anything that fundamental is changing. The decay of things like radium are observable. What factor could change that? Is there a mechanism I dont know about that could speed up the decaying of radioctive material?

Your whole rebuttal was a parable. It wasnt scientific. Your trying to relate two non related topics.

justfinethanku June 28 2005, 19:51:06 UTC

my whole rebuttal was not a parable but an analogy.

the topic I brought up, though it is non-related, brings about a good point. in the story told their was no evidence shown for the man having ever walked faster or any other means of transportation.

Your not going to find evidence for everything. It is impossible. some things do not leave detectable traces.